From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id yTkpGEKFyWOTcxoAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:00:34 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 567E41E128; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:00:34 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=s3D7QkQq; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 005BC1E0D3 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:00:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA1C3858291 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:00:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7EA1C3858291 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1674151233; bh=5Ci71XydiilKm9S/hJt+nuHuD3aahuEvXxIWovU8Qis=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=s3D7QkQqyBU03NZnjxefW9pftluXPbdcLaBe5m/vd6SBtuXWh95MRzYLbVN23tIHH HLO1/OZXS7ZpV46PQr0VrDpQTowgOkPkDA/9/GtA4afuqmlm/uP/o8Hhiq5h0nWUjH ye2+Rt9I/y3BbE46eJ+gyZTydxcuN+aBSIaYqyEw= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51EED3858C52 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:00:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 51EED3858C52 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIZCv-00084k-AT; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:00:13 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIZCu-0007zJ-Gz; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:00:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:00:11 +0200 Message-Id: <83r0vqo15g.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20230119174156.654402-1-tom@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:41:56 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC] Deprecate stabs References: <20230119174156.654402-1-tom@tromey.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:41:56 -0700 > > I think it's time to deprecate stabs, and plan to remove all support > for them. Stabs are long since obsolete and are not really maintained > in gdb. GCC deprecated them in 12 and will remove them as well. IMO, we should remove support for stabs _after_ GCC, not before and not together with it. Not sure if "GDB 15" fits that.