From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-66780-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7596 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2009 19:36:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 7587 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Sep 2009 19:36:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:36:14 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KPV00G00IC5SM00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:36:11 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.50.163]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KPV00DVEIGB5VA0@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:36:11 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:36:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Support for Xilinx MicroBlaze architecture (1 of 3)
In-reply-to: <4AABE9EE.6040606@eagercon.com>
To: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83pr9wymz8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4AAAA1CF.6080403@eagercon.com> <833a6s1rds.fsf@gnu.org> <4AABE9EE.6040606@eagercon.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:35:26 -0700
> From: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >>                                                       By default
> >> +@code{xmd} uses port @code{1234}.
> > 
> > Is there a way to change this default, and if so, should we let the
> > user know how to do that?
> 
> There's documentation in the Xilinx EDK/SDK or running "xmd --help"
> lists the options.  I believe that there is an option to set the port.
> 
> Do you think that xmd should be described in the gdb info?  Or
> only this option?

Only that option would be enough.  In fact, it's even enough to say
"See the Xilinx EDK/SDK documentation or run @kbd{xmd --help}, for how
to set the port number."