From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25051 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2009 19:55:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 25043 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2009 19:55:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:55:40 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KRO00300CEFRO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:55:08 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.117.47]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KRO00JC2CNWIPD0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:55:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:55:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC][patch] Allow to disassemble line. In-reply-to: <8ac60eac0910171008o3256a583n3aa323337b594bb6@mail.gmail.com> To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83pr8lhk66.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20091002004954.8966C76B2B@ppluzhnikov.mtv.corp.google.com> <8ac60eac0910080916i5a2eb49an5f21f3b5c7fb96ef@mail.gmail.com> <20091008162350.GA8625@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0910080952p46f15693x6ed339473db0139d@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0910161607k55fee22cs379c5b7635d7b6a@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0910161611u7056433m8912ce9ac5a83134@mail.gmail.com> <83zl7qh163.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0910170849p45d24187o449011fc0aa21fc7@mail.gmail.com> <83skdige7b.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0910171008o3256a583n3aa323337b594bb6@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:08:41 -0700 > From: Paul Pluzhnikov > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:49:48 -0700 > > > However, in that case, how about using ">" instead of "*"? > > That of course is a trivial one character change to the patch, and > sounds like a good idea to me. Maybe something even more prominent, > like "=> " ? That's even better. > > We should also mention this in the manual > > Will do. Thanks.