From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5078 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2010 17:08:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 5066 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2010 17:08:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:08:17 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4W0000026HA200@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:08:14 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.12.240]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4W00MBZ29NNE20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:08:12 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:08:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Static tracepoints support In-reply-to: <201007011500.27076.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83pqz79lhg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201006251931.57860.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83tyoqcc8i.fsf@gnu.org> <201006281326.39820.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201007011500.27076.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:00:26 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > > On Monday 28 June 2010 13:26:38, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > > +with that name. With no LOCATION, uses current execution address of \n\ > > > > +selected stack frame.\n\ > > > > > > "of the selected stack frame" > > > > Fixed. Needs fixing in BREAK_ARGS_HELP; it's showing up in the help > > strings of all breakpoint commands. > > > > Here's the fix for all other breakpoint commands, but I do > note some sort of pattern here: it appears that "the" was > avoided on purpose in all the sentences as can be seen in > the contenxt of the patch. Would you like to review > the whole help string, or is this correct? "the selected stack frame" is correct here. Thanks.