From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23701 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2013 12:06:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23692 invoked by uid 89); 30 Aug 2013 12:06:58 -0000 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:06:58 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MSC00H00EQOLF00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:06:52 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MSC00H7TEZGI340@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:06:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:06:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] Add MPX feature description to GDB manual. In-reply-to: <1377856683-11267-9-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> To: Walfred Tedeschi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, walfred.tedeschi@intel.com, mircea.gherzan@intel.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ppsve61r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1377856683-11267-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <1377856683-11267-9-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00910.txt.bz2 > From: Walfred Tedeschi > Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:58:03 +0200 > > Describes MPX feature registers including bnd0raw ... bnd3raw, bnd0 ... bnd3 > bndstatus and bndcfgu. Thanks. I have a few comments to the documentation patch. > +@samp{bnd0raw} through @samp{bnd3raw} for i386, amd64 and x32. Hardware > +representation of the bound registers. ^^ Two spaces between sentences, please (here and elsewhere in the patch). > +User representation of the bound registers. Takes into account the one > +complement of the upper bound. The value of an upper bound taken from It is unclear to me what you meant by "the one complement of the upper bound"; please explain, or suggest a rewording that would make it more clear.