From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14715 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2014 16:42:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14705 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2014 16:42:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:42:41 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N19006004ZB8P00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:42:38 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N19005YP532VO70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:42:38 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:42:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile In-reply-to: <87wqgr8rsj.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver Cc: ludo@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ppmj5a0l.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <834n3x8o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <83y519788a.fsf@gnu.org> <871tz0d5vc.fsf@gnu.org> <83iosc76kz.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqgr8rsj.fsf@netris.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00602.txt.bz2 > From: Mark H Weaver > Cc: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), guile-devel@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:50:36 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to > > configure it without threads, I would suggest that this be the default > > for MinGW, but that isn't a big deal. > > FWIW, the situation seems to have improved since you last looked. In > the last couple of weeks, madsy on #guile reported cross-building a > recent Guile snapshot (stable-2.0 branch) using MinGW Which MinGW? It sounds like nowadays one needs to distinguish between the various flavors. The exact port of pthreads and gc might also matter. > with thread support enabled and without --disable-posix, and it > seems to work reasonably well. It runs the REPL without problems > and passes much of the test suite. Good to know; I hope to see a release some place near me in a not-so-distant future, and will test this at that time.