From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id Qcg1A2YNT2JjbgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:12:22 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id EF4A01F344; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:12:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86691E787 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABD93857C71 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:12:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6ABD93857C71 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1649347939; bh=z89LoTnXKAvpDa8Q4NK4a3Z2XOz7x1rkRuiOYsB8b0Y=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=h4qaz7LOlCh+fe1ZyZtHq5UPV4XVlCKvpfsfJgh8aSJLpaF00LHSMtiRP+agFeHx4 eo9y5mylx/6BG28mbrAIwkV5ioeG2LnYvp95bj3Ke/T6lnB9MG+Y4Fz0ENXcpHS92A xxY7lWTm6ydHFmRZXRqIKAkH7WozTOd3iemJ1SXI= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2273858002 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:12:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0B2273858002 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ncUjo-0003Cd-19; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:12:00 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2753 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ncUjn-0005nB-EO; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:11:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 19:12:08 +0300 Message-Id: <83pmlsc1pj.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tom Tromey In-Reply-To: <87ee28anbg.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:08:19 -0600) Subject: Re: GDB 12.0.90 available for testing References: <20220320055815.2A90FA4D6C@takamaka.home> <83v8w0ag5j.fsf@gnu.org> <83tubkadx4.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee28anbg.fsf@tromey.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:08:19 -0600 > > >> My understanding is that gnulib updates in GDB are performed only > >> as needed, by the people who need it. > > Eli> Fine with me, thanks. > > If there's a particular gnulib import that's needed, I'm happy to do it. > I'd just need to know the revision. It isn't a single update. I identified at least 2, maybe 3 changes Gnulib installed based on my reports of problems found in GDB 11. > Or, maybe we should just adopt a policy of doing an import from > gnulib HEAD on trunk after a release branch is made? IMO, it would be best. But that's not my call, especially since Joel says there seems to be a policy about that. > I'm not sure whether we want to attempt an update on the GDB 12 branch. No, I don't think we should. It's too late for GDB 12, IMO.