From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id yPVlCZPJuWNcxxEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:35:47 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 217FD1E222; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 14:35:47 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=BVMVAABD; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB5D51E110 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 14:35:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCF13858404 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 19:35:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CCF13858404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1673120146; bh=+dKTUEoDcr21h8eVZsS/vNYLQgwnN8IQUqHJEzg1M4w=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=BVMVAABDa+eLHyJWCK/UKXiwC9bbfZ9awqfIdtmUlgKm0/I9aPpP8MhBzMFfPyKDB 0HrxCi+Pkjb2ubU41Zf6cPUKx3/wRsJIIeXg5apZcUiNuCg72ax0rUXaIRKrHI19/u um+tXGjMeG6ziMMVKEGxCY2NLlW5asCc5hifw14U= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4451A3858D35 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 19:35:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4451A3858D35 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEEyR-0001rR-70; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:35:23 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEEyQ-000477-Jo; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:35:22 -0500 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 21:35:43 +0200 Message-Id: <83pmbqqgs0.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andreas Schwab Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87sfgmdu3t.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 07 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100) Subject: Re: Two observations using GDB 13 snapshot References: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0w6uaad.fsf@gnu.org> <87fscmemeo.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83358mu1tv.fsf@gnu.org> <87bknaek9z.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83v8lisjlx.fsf@gnu.org> <87lemeh4wz.fsf@igel.home> <83h6x2sb5x.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz7qh2db.fsf@igel.home> <83a62usabj.fsf@gnu.org> <878rieh194.fsf@igel.home> <838ries9je.fsf@gnu.org> <874jt2h0hq.fsf@igel.home> <835ydis7qt.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgaufj4w.fsf@igel.home> <83zgauqqa5.fsf@gnu.org> <1151933072.13100631.1673108176724@mail.yahoo.com> <87mt6ufdle.fsf@igel.home> <83tu12qkt4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a62ufbf2.fsf@igel.home> <83r0w6qjf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfgmdu3t.fsf@igel.home> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100 > > On Jan 07 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> >> > Isn't --enable-shared the default? > >> >> > >> >> No. > >> > > >> > gdb/libtool thinks shared libraries should be built: > >> > >> bfd/libtool and opcodes/libtool don't. > > > > But the issue at hand is about what happens in gdb/, not in bfd or > > opcodes. > > Only bfd and opcodes build possibly shared libraries, and only that will > have an affect on the necessity to build a gdb libtool wrapper. > > >> As you already discovered, gdb/libtool is not used for building > >> libraries at all. > > > > So you are saying it's a bug in gdb/configure? > > No. Then I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying.