From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79765-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31689 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 20:06:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 31680 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 20:06:57 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:06:51 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LI6005002I2HN00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:06:49 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.107.218]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LI60040F2JBQU80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:06:49 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:13:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [python] [patch] Add is_valid to several classes
In-reply-to: <m3tyf2vnp6.fsf@redhat.com>
To: pmuldoon@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83oc5aq17q.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3sjun9hp7.fsf@redhat.com> <83r5a6q39z.fsf@gnu.org> <m3tyf2vnp6.fsf@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2

> From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:02:13 +0000
> 
> >> +@code{gdb.Block} supports via the Python method @code{iter} function.
> >
> > Did you really mean to say "Python method `iter' function"?  I think
> > either "method" or "function", no?
> 
> iter() is a built in Python function (nothing to do with GDB), that
> extracts an iterator from a Python object if the object supports it.  I
> don't mind how we word it. It was purely illustrative.  In fact in
> Python there are many ways to invoke iteration in an object that
> supports it.  The "in" keyword for example (IE, for x in y).
> What do you think?

How about

  @code{gdb.Block} supports via the Python method @code{iter}.

?  Is that accurate?