From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8850 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2012 17:38:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 8731 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2012 17:38:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:38:27 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M2Z00200VI2P500@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:38:07 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.249.186]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M2Z002VHVNIMM50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:38:07 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] - Improve suggestions for generating patches in CONTRIBUTE In-reply-to: To: Siva Chandra Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83obqhf2sy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120416144401.GI2852@adacore.com> <4F8C34A8.30101@redhat.com> <20120417145452.GL2852@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00808.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:27:42 +0530 > From: Siva Chandra > Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > Eli Zaretskii > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I also think that 2 GMs agreeing to remove "diff -cp" is enough > > to proceed, but I can take care of removing this part once your > > patch is in. I don't want you to keep flip-flopping just because > > of me. > > Since I have not heard from Eli yet Sorry, what is it that you've waited me to say? If this is about unified vs context diffs, then I have no preference; I can get along with either kind. Thanks.