From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8606 invoked by alias); 17 May 2012 16:10:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 8554 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2012 16:10:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 16:09:48 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M4600800CTDFK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:08:59 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M46007GPCUXR390@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:08:57 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:10:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] microMIPS support In-reply-to: To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83obpmokik.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k414fjmp.fsf@gnu.org> <83haw6io8k.fsf@gnu.org> <8362cmi65h.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5ph6nqj.fsf@gnu.org> <83k40usfjk.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:06:37 +0100 > From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" > CC: > > > > if I place a @menu reference to that node in any of the upper sections. > > > > That's most probably because you added only some of the menus, not all > > of them. The minor variation of your patch below doesn't have this > > problem, it produces an Info manual without any warnings or errors. > > I added only some of the menus by your explicit request. You rejected my > proposal that I made in response which added all of them and that was only > trivially different to the version you have proposed now. In that case, I apologize for my initial misunderstanding. > > > I'll be pushing it in this form as soon as the MIPS16 manual > > > function call change has been committed. > > > > I believe committing a patch over objections of the responsible > > maintainer is against the rules described in MAINTAINERS (as I > > understand them). So please don't do that. > > Certainly, next time I'll just drop any changes to the manual I disagree > with. I'd prefer that next time we could arrive at an agreement sooner. > > Please use the slightly modified patch below instead. > > Thanks for your proposal, even though my original concern about pages > containing single-entry menus still stands. This doesn't really matter > however for two reasons, first and foremost because you have the power to > override my objection to any changes to the manual, and second because it > contains changes irrelevant to my change and as such I cannot integrate > them. Please split changes to the existing pieces of the manual off and > commit them separately. I'll extract the rest and fold into my change. Which changes are irrelevant? I tried deliberately to put aside any such unrelated changes, but maybe I missed some.