From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-95214-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2748 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2012 17:23:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 2737 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Oct 2012 17:23:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:23:09 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MBY002002V7N800@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:23:04 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MBY002NQ2YG6C70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:23:04 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:23:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix .text section offset for windows DLL (was Calling __stdcall functions in the inferior)
In-reply-to: <006001cdaada$00c81f00$02585d00$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83obk34pku.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83a9vs89r9.fsf@gnu.org> <201210120953.q9C9rqfu020865@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <834nm07z0s.fsf@gnu.org> <5077FEB9.4030304@redhat.com> <83y5jb7rfe.fsf@gnu.org> <006001cdaada$00c81f00$02585d00$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:35:55 +0200
> 
>   After some investigation, I noticed that
> the minimal symbol GetLastError was offset by 0xf0000
> respective to the  '_imp__GetLastError@0'.
> 
>   The patch attached allowed me to call
> (gdb) call GetLastError ()
> And get a simple 
> $2 = 126
> (for instance, depending on when you do the call).

Thanks.

>   Could someone please test the patch and 
> confirm that it does fix the problem?

I will try that in a few days.

> +      if (!section_found)
> +	{
> +	  char * forward_name = (char *) (erva + func_rva);
> +	  char * funcname = (char *) (erva + name_rva);
> +          if ((func_rva >= export_rva) 
> +              && (func_rva < export_rva + export_size)) 
> +	  printf ("%s is a forward to %s\n", funcname, forward_name);

Is this printf really necessary?