From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51679 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2015 19:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51670 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jul 2015 19:06:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:06:33 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NRN00A00BJP7U00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:06:31 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NRN00ASQBQD6O20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:06:31 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:06:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update? In-reply-to: <55A94B87.5060901@codesourcery.com> To: Luis Machado Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, keiths@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, yunlian@google.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83oaja61u6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150717175328.GA15874@adacore.com> <55A94617.1040701@codesourcery.com> <20150717183246.GC7406@adacore.com> <55A94B87.5060901@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00520.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:37:59 -0300 > From: Luis Machado > CC: , , Jan Kratochvil , > > > But, back to your question, very definitely. If we can't even build > > on Windows, we should at least decide what to do next. I haven't seen > > the error; do you happen to have a link handy? Do you happen to have > > a link? > > > > Jan-Benedict posted one example here: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-06/msg00650.html > > I see something similar related to the implicit declaration of asprintf. I see it also, but it's just a warning that doesn't affect the correctness of the code. It would be nice to fix that before the relase, of course.