From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17238 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2019 06:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17229 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2019 06:02:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=reveals, H*r:sk:RSA_AES, HX-Languages-Length:1223, H*r:4.82 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:02:27 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iA6ZE-0005ZB-8i; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:02:24 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4192 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iA6ZC-0002PH-IU; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:02:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83o8zjwjdf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: carl@bordum.dk, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Simon Marchi on Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:19:12 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb docs: do not format the ++ in C++ in man page References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 > From: Simon Marchi > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:19:12 -0400 > > On 2019-09-16 5:47 p.m., Carl Bordum Hansen wrote: > > This change means that the html version of the man page does not stylize > > the "++" in the third paragraph. > > (https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/gdb-man.html). The > > tradeoff is, in my opinion, worth it as the man page reads better, since > > it is now formatted properly. Before this change, it read as: > > "... programs written in C, C@t{++}, ...". > > --- > > > > Hello, this is my first patch to a GNU project ever and also the first time I > > use an email-based git workflow, so please excuse my mistakes :-) > > Hi Carl, > > Thanks for your patches. I see you've used git-send-email, that's excellent. > > Like I said on IRC, I think the best way to fix this would be to fix the texi2pod.pl > script to handle @t instead. I agree, but I'm also confused about the problem. If I go to that page, I don't see @t there, and looking at the page source reveals that C@t{++} has been correctly converted to C++. So I'm not sure why Carl sees something different. What am I missing here?