Re: [patch] Remove unimplemented MI commands [Re: Learn function name by its address]

Stan Shebs
2009-07-01T19:14:14Z

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> I tend to think that if nobody has implemented these in $X years, then
>>>> nobody ever will. But then, I'm generally also in the "never comment
>>>> out code, just delete it" camp.
>>>>
>>> So am I. The code is still around, just in CVS instead of inside
>>> a comment. Leaving it commented out just creates more clutter that
>>> tends to stay rather than being fixed. So I really favor deleting.
>>>
>> Ok, patch attached.
>>
>
> The code patch is fine. Although at least one of those commands is likely
> to be implemented within a year (-break-commands), there's no point to
> keep it recognized-but-not-implemented for now.
>
Also CodeSourcery has a contract to implement MI versions of tracepoint
commands, but we might as well start fresh, rather than try to preserve
a few lines of ancient code.

Stan