From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-68220-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29717 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2009 19:46:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 29692 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2009 19:46:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:46:05 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KSR0090080XE600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:45:56 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KSR008CU88J6M30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:45:55 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:46:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] Fix missing title in HTML documentation
In-reply-to: <20091107194204.GO4557@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83my2y9l3a.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20091107183407.GN4557@adacore.com> <83pr7u9lhh.fsf@gnu.org> <20091107194204.GO4557@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:42:04 -0800
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > OK, assuming that you ran all the other targets in doc/Makefile.in and
> > verified that there are no adverse effects.
> 
> I did. But it becomes a lot harder to verify the differences for the
> files other than HTML.  The PDFs for instances are reported as binary
> files, and so it's hard to get diffs. I just looked at the PDF, and
> it looked fine.

Info, HTML, and plain-text outputs can be compared with Diff.  For the
rest, visual verification is fine with me.

Thanks.