From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6934 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2010 17:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 6922 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2010 17:10:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:10:19 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4W00L00269PF00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:09:38 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.12.240]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4W00I6J2C1MZC0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:09:38 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:10:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: clarify "help break" output a bit (Re: Static tracepoints support) In-reply-to: <201007011522.45001.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83mxub9lf3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201006251931.57860.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201006292159.49527.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8339w4bd3q.fsf@gnu.org> <201007011522.45001.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:22:44 +0100 > > On Wednesday 30 June 2010 19:16:09, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > But only if the conditionals are different. > > > > > > > > Anyway, it confused me, so perhaps it's a good idea to clarify. > > > > > > Okay, I agree, though I'd prefer to do that as a follow up, where I > > > change both the break- and tracepoint command's help output at once. > > > Is that okay with you? > > > > Yes. > > Thanks. Here's a patch. Okay? Yes, thanks.