From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-95328-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15234 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2012 17:33:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 14946 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2012 17:33:38 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:33:33 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MC300500NC99C00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:33:31 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MC3005V7NFV6E20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:33:31 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:33:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR14617: New MI notification on tracepoint modified.
In-reply-to: <1350556586-12800-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83mwzj1y83.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1350556586-12800-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2

> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:36:26 +0800
> 
> As PR gdb/14617 described, when the passcount of a tracepoint is
> modified, GDB doesn't emit any notification.  This patch adds a
> new notification '=tracepoint-modified' for the changes to
> tracepoint-specific attributes.  The reason I don't use
> '=breakpoint-modified' notification is that IMO, it is about
> changes to general breakpoints (breakpoint, tracepoint, catchpoint,
> etc), so I don't want to put tracepoint-specific stuff into
> it.
> 
> Regression tested on x86_64-linux with both native and gdbserver,
> OK to apply?

The documentation parts are OK.  Thanks.