From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-105065-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6752 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2013 08:45:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 6664 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2013 08:45:32 -0000
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:45:32 +0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MSP00L0041R6800@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:45:29 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MSP00K0E4BTYN50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:45:29 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:45:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Trust readonly sections if target has memory protection
In-reply-to: <522990FF.30608@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83mwnqmj8f.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1378432920-7731-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83txhymr02.fsf@gnu.org> <522990FF.30608@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:23:27 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> On 09/06/2013 01:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Which "ancient" Windows versions are those?  Can't we decide at run
> > time whether to trust read-only sections, by looking at the Windows
> > version?
> 
> I meant Windows 3.0 and 9x, which don't have a full memory protection,
> AFAIK.

MinGW doesn't support Windows 3.x, and I think Cygwin doesn't support
9x anymore.