From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15986 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2014 07:53:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15974 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2014 07:53:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 07:53:01 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NGI00H00G4TWW00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:52:58 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NGI00H73GKAQK60@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:52:58 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 07:53:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: path to find libcc1.so? In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83mw6sq941.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:22:38 -0800 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: gdb-patches > > I was reading the new "compile" code and a question occurred to me. > Do we want to give the user a parameter to specify the path of libcc1.so? Shouldn't "gcc -print-file-name" know how to find it? > (say if it's in a non-standard location) > Or is the plan to tell users to use existing mechanisms > (LD_LIBRARY_PATH, et.al.)? LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't exist on Windows, for one.