From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78367 invoked by alias); 27 May 2016 18:47:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 78356 invoked by uid 89); 27 May 2016 18:47:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=pay, HX-HELO:eggs.gnu.org, Hx-spam-relays-external:208.118.235.92, H*RU:208.118.235.92 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 27 May 2016 18:47:32 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mn8-0004yb-67 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:47:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mn8-0004xu-3L; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:47:26 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3588 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mn6-0006hq-AJ; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:47:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83mvnbz6bd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: David Taylor CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <14203.1464367919@usendtaylorx2l> (message from David Taylor on Fri, 27 May 2016 12:51:59 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document short responses to qXfer:object:read. Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <14203.1464367919@usendtaylorx2l> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2 > From: David Taylor > cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:51:59 -0400 > > > Finally, it looks to me that we should move the description of the > > responses to precede the details of the 'read' requests, since the > > list of those requests is very long, and thus the promised description > > of the responses "below" is very far away, which IMO gets in the way > > of reading and comprehending the issue. > > > > > Now, can we come up with better wording? > > > > After we've figured out the above left-overs, sure. > > > > Thanks. > > I didn't pay attention to that as it was far enough after the text in > question and looked -- at quick glance -- like it was part of the osdata > description and therefore not relevant to threads. > > Taking a longer look, it clearly is relevant. > > It addresses most of my concerns and moving it, as you suggested, would > definitely, IMO, help. I already moved it. If you think something still needs to be augmented there, please tell what that is. Thanks.