From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45347 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2017 16:27:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 45337 invoked by uid 89); 21 Oct 2017 16:27:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 16:27:23 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5wcG-0004RZ-MP for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:27:21 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5wcG-0004RR-IO; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:27:16 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4634 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e5wcF-0002zT-H8; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:27:16 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 16:27:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83mv4kbh61.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Simon Marchi on Sat, 21 Oct 2017 10:13:20 -0400) Subject: Re: Breakpoint commands in MI mode and "backtrace" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <8360bqt0im.fsf@gnu.org> <8a3d7153-7486-032f-aabc-6c3453f96459@simark.ca> <83shetsdg2.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9phs8zw.fsf@gnu.org> <83d15wsrvw.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmlgsqpm.fsf@gnu.org> <83vaj8c3fj.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00701.txt.bz2 > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Simon Marchi > Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 10:13:20 -0400 > > > Since this worked for me, in GDB 8.0, can something similar be put in > > the current master, so the next GDB release will have this bug fixed? > > > > Thanks. > > I'll look into it, but I'll try a slightly different patch. The one I sent > previously sets and restores the interpreter at every executed command, which > is inefficient. I'll try to set and restore only once at a higher level in > the call stack. Thank you.