From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6689A3857C57 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:35:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6689A3857C57 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jsU5P-0001lu-Lh; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:35:19 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2350 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jsU5P-0004on-67; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:35:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 19:35:27 +0300 Message-Id: <83mu4csisw.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Hannes Domani Cc: cbiesinger@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@adacore.com In-Reply-To: <1241581576.5386594.1594031968947@mail.yahoo.com> (message from Hannes Domani on Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:39:28 +0000 (UTC)) Subject: Re: Building today's snapshot of GDB with MinGW References: <83a70l20dn.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo3ozlvn.fsf@gnu.org> <56f26808-dfb0-6703-6f1f-9818c35946dd@polymtl.ca> <83o8ozxnw7.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftaay7hh.fsf@gnu.org> <1853479308.2462200.1593685100184@mail.yahoo.com> <835zb6xdci.fsf@gnu.org> <1241581576.5386594.1594031968947@mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:35:21 -0000 > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:39:28 +0000 (UTC) > From: Hannes Domani > Cc: cbiesinger@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, > tromey@adacore.com > > > > I never had this kind of problem on Windows 10, probably because I use > > > pdcurses instead of ncurses. > > > > > > Are your command prompt windows working in the native mode or in > > legacy mode? > > > > If this is specific to ncurses, maybe we should ask Thom Dickey to > > investigate this. > > I actually didn't know about legacy/native mode until you mentioned it. > And I checked now, I'm using native mode. Thanks. It is strange that one version of curses triggers the problem while another doesn't. I guess one needs to look at the low-level code used by ncurses to access the Windows console device.