From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id JW+xJi/OjmA8JgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 02 May 2021 12:07:11 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9266C1F11C; Sun, 2 May 2021 12:07:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0667B1E54D for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 12:07:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC843894416; Sun, 2 May 2021 16:07:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7FC843894416 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619971630; bh=JcOM0t4bdJPKBycl89Ni/QZK8J1QpatbojffSpmlMdg=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=xkwf8P0NLWNyNcptzsq2LPFP2KgvCNioeDFQdCszR7W5qE2l1kiRikUW9oO7pk0+z GjPrrC4j2P0rxkQMh07PdrcoWsQxiU3Mq2ZXwl1kqcIEcQegxTfbNcFhI0WG66ESCM 8q629SNoUEwQaHyw2kZptfflA+u9UHnQk/jqMfB4= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C909388A031 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 16:07:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 9C909388A031 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldEcK-0003JK-K9; Sun, 02 May 2021 12:07:01 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3549 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ldEcB-0002Fm-6E; Sun, 02 May 2021 12:06:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 19:06:19 +0300 Message-Id: <83mttd6ryc.fsf@gnu.org> To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: (message from Mike Frysinger on Sun, 2 May 2021 11:47:37 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnulib: import getline References: <20210501220936.30972-1-vapier@gentoo.org> <533969a7-d2fe-cdbd-40dc-e77eab30a469@polymtl.ca> <838s4x8v5u.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmy96vkb.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8dt6tvs.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 11:47:37 -0400 > From: Mike Frysinger > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > they're clearly half-assing and/or understaffed. normal for open source, > but i don't think anyone should be surprised when users think mingw hasn't > been updated in ages, and why mingw64 was forked and has since become the > more canonical implementation. Well, I wrote what I wrote so that you know better.