From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 1zxBLBdJRWLrZwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 02:24:23 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A1C131F163; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 02:24:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE221E150 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 02:24:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80C53857404 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 06:24:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B80C53857404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1648707861; bh=KfI/mUI0yEy80GiyMpHt+UQHL2LATlQommn4Cc+4JyE=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=qHXljAVHwLAekYMDbJsozo6TCJasOielqvioqKpMQU0dB/MXlRTaJJwZm7YgzOOu8 PnCmyZF2L/sEFnrFUAZr5ywz4hPxdgqY7DvD44Wj5q/yXVB/1daAb5qLeDSAnoJYD3 B/D3KcOGCbB7bAi+726mM8KMr/cnfzwgidEovdrk= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4D1E385E007 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 06:23:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D4D1E385E007 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=51980 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZoDT-0003kh-Ew; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 02:23:31 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1193 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZoDO-000527-UR; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 02:23:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:23:37 +0300 Message-Id: <83mth67i8m.fsf@gnu.org> To: brobecker@adacore.com In-Reply-To: <83ilrzap07.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 09:27:52 +0300) Subject: Re: GDB 12.0.90 available for testing References: <20220320055815.2A90FA4D6C@takamaka.home> <83sfr4a93r.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmm8a7gn.fsf@gnu.org> <83o81sa6nu.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilrzap07.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 09:27:52 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 21:51:49 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > And yet another issue: if I start GDB with the MI interface: > > > > gdb -i=mi PROGRAM > > > > then whatever I type at the prompt GDB thinks I typed "g": > > > > (gdb) > > r -Q > > &"g\n" > > &"Ambiguous command \"g\": gcore, generate-core-file, goto-bookmark, gr, gu, guile, guile-repl.\n" > > ^error,msg="Ambiguous command \"g\": gcore, generate-core-file, goto-bookmark, gr, gu, guile, guile-repl." > > (gdb) > > > > As you see, I typed "r -Q", but GDB thinks I typed "g". > > This is now a Bugzilla PR 29002. I posted my proposed solution there, > see > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29002 Ping! The two issues described in this PR are IMO serious and should be fixed before GDB 12.1 is released. Could someone please respond to what I wrote there, and propose how to fix this without adversely affecting GNU/Linux (and possibly other non-Windows platforms)?