From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21989 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2009 18:32:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 21981 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2009 18:32:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:32:29 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KOW005008R3NI00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:32:26 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.180.85]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KOW00ILP8U1RU50@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:32:26 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:54:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch/doc] Tweak "info inferiors" output. In-reply-to: <200908241155.17035.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: stan@codesourcery.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ljl9dpvp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200908141646.01031.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83eirai8et.fsf@gnu.org> <4A89B61F.5090307@codesourcery.com> <200908241155.17035.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:55:16 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > tromey@redhat.com, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Is this OK then? Yes, but I have one tiny nit: > +@item > +the target system's inferior identifier (@var{systag}) We don't seem to use @var{systag} in this text; do we really need it? Otherwise, fine with me. Thanks.