From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30389 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2012 17:29:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 30380 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2012 17:29:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:29:37 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3500D00EYOBE00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:29:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.249.186]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3500DE6F9AAU40@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:29:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:33:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC - doc] Add note about the possibility of symbols getting moved across blocks In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: sivachandra@google.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83lilhgk1o.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <83bomgfcbt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipgna94k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83y5pjedjp.fsf@gnu.org> <87397qa9a0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83fwbqinsw.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqatgp9k.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01019.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:49:35 -0700 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > >  A @code{gdb.Block} is iterable.  The iterator returns the symbols > >  (@pxref{Symbols In Python}) local to the block.  Python programs > >  should not assume that a specific block object will always contain a > >  given symbol, since changes in @value{GDBN} features and > >  infrastructure may cause symbols move across blocks in a symbol > >  table. > > I think that's close enough. > > s/symbols move/symbols to move/ ? I think omitting "to" makes it more correct English.