From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10997 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2012 08:33:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 10989 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Apr 2012 08:33:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:33:23 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3600800KYX0N00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:33:21 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.21.156]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M36007TRL3LTL70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:33:21 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:54:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts In-reply-to: <837gx7hhxa.fsf@gnu.org> To: brobecker@adacore.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83lilg6ysn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vckviv3b.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419154853.GM25623@adacore.com> <83sjfzitxx.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4vjitnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419185329.GO25623@adacore.com> <83mx67ikxm.fsf@gnu.org> <837gx7hhxa.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01052.txt.bz2 Ping! Is the patch below OK for committing? > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:04:17 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > [I moved this to gdb-patches, since I propose a patch below.] > > > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:24:53 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > > > > The crux of my question was why non-interactive mode does display a > > prompt while the interactive one doesn't. > > To answer my own question, here's why: > > char * > command_line_input (char *prompt_arg, int repeat, char *annotation_suffix) > { > ... > /* Don't use fancy stuff if not talking to stdin. */ > if (deprecated_readline_hook && input_from_terminal_p ()) > { > rl = (*deprecated_readline_hook) (local_prompt); > } > else if (command_editing_p && input_from_terminal_p ()) > { > rl = gdb_readline_wrapper (local_prompt); > } > else > { > rl = gdb_readline (local_prompt); > } > > Now, the code is clear, but I cannot say I understand the logic. If > the input is from terminal, we ask (inside gdb_readline_wrapper) the > current interpreter whether to show the prompt. But if input is _not_ > from terminal, we display the prompt unconditionally (inside > gdb_readline). How does this make sense? > > > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:53:29 -0700 > > From: Joel Brobecker > > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > > > > The other thing that occured to me was that, perhaps, we should instead > > be switching the interpreter while executing the console command, > > I arrived to the same conclusion, eventually. See below. > > > but I doubt that would be correct. > > Why not? The patch below works for me. > > --- gdb/interps.c~0 2012-01-06 06:43:17.000000000 +0200 > +++ gdb/interps.c 2012-04-22 08:55:27.056588400 +0300 > @@ -253,6 +253,18 @@ interp_ui_out (struct interp *interp) > return current_interpreter->procs->ui_out_proc (current_interpreter); > } > > +/* Temporarily overrides the current interpreter. */ > +struct interp * > +interp_set_temp (const char *name) > +{ > + struct interp *interp = interp_lookup (name); > + struct interp *old_interp = current_interpreter; > + > + if (interp) > + current_interpreter = interp; > + return old_interp; > +} > + > /* Returns the interpreter's cookie. */ > > void * > --- gdb/interps.h~0 2012-01-06 06:43:17.000000000 +0200 > +++ gdb/interps.h 2012-04-22 08:42:05.687879800 +0300 > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ > extern struct ui_out *interp_ui_out (struct interp *interp); > extern void *interp_data (struct interp *interp); > extern const char *interp_name (struct interp *interp); > +extern struct interp *interp_set_temp (const char *name); > > extern int current_interp_named_p (const char *name); > extern int current_interp_display_prompt_p (void); > --- gdb/cli/cli-script.c~0 2012-01-06 06:43:32.000000000 +0200 > +++ gdb/cli/cli-script.c 2012-04-22 09:04:23.533807200 +0300 > @@ -1178,6 +1178,12 @@ recurse_read_control_structure (char * ( > return ret; > } > > +static void > +restore_interp (void *arg) > +{ > + interp_set_temp (interp_name ((struct interp *)arg)); > +} > + > /* Read lines from the input stream and accumulate them in a chain of > struct command_line's, which is then returned. For input from a > terminal, the special command "end" is used to mark the end of the > @@ -1210,8 +1216,21 @@ read_command_lines (char *prompt_arg, in > } > } > > - head = read_command_lines_1 (read_next_line, parse_commands, > - validator, closure); > + > + /* Reading commands assumes the CLI behavior, so temporarily > + override the current interpreter with CLI. */ > + if (current_interp_named_p (INTERP_CONSOLE)) > + head = read_command_lines_1 (read_next_line, parse_commands, > + validator, closure); > + else > + { > + struct interp *old_interp = interp_set_temp (INTERP_CONSOLE); > + struct cleanup *old_chain = make_cleanup (restore_interp, old_interp); > + > + head = read_command_lines_1 (read_next_line, parse_commands, > + validator, closure); > + do_cleanups (old_chain); > + } > > if (deprecated_readline_end_hook && from_tty && input_from_terminal_p ()) > { >