From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-98653-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16211 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2013 16:35:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 15781 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Feb 2013 16:35:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:35:38 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MIH003007401I00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:34:46 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MIH0030E7DX2810@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:34:45 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:35:00 -0000
Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and truncated.
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python Scripting] New method gdb.Architecture.disassemble
In-reply-to: <C75A84166056C94F84D238A44AF9F6AD392FFA@AUSX10MPC103.AMER.DELL.COM>
To: Paul_Koning@Dell.com
Cc: sivachandra@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dje@google.com, tromey@redhat.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83liakp8i7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAGyQ6gy_08hZn2Pk6pmD+AuOkH7SCsQ6732KTa7sucZ7-4prUA@mail.gmail.com> <20753.38272.55066.651097@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAGyQ6gy68LdCd_qxDX7vinMg-Pb6qnukGScOw2uzgezxKxh_TA@mail.gmail.com> <CADPb22TGJNFg7VJkeoTB7Ctd=K2Tc490LKo_mdUVXFF2K6TV5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGyQ6gweW=9L4mVCkFetd+LvvpjSYzYKM78mYDu5HfG1LpVwiQ@mail.gmail.com> <87txphmdt3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CAGyQ6gzSs617BRcreAGA5418EpXaqCaPN8ZzKjQYNx9yxDSJRA@mail.gmail.com> <87r4kkks5g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CAGyQ6gwSnFH3OKHSpNxVmVxRRRM61c=T=euhJg6hyFL7+88ecg@mail.gmail.com> <20763.64197.459891.627211@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAGyQ6gxOqnD0tr+rR2kuYBr6ub6vN8DvGG5PxA+BO-O8VYXVqA@mail.gmail.com> <20765.55532.700460.792597@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAGyQ6gxX7r9QWY+ze9kzyjAwqCf9-kTmor2JRFAoW1mx=x47Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGyQ6gzmBtx4AO=Md8_Bzj9Nqkd0iPXhLGOkBPe0Zi-DPD0cGg@mail.gmail.com> <83a9r4sl04.fsf@gnu.org> <CAGyQ6gyAwQpBJ41bOtvQOGKM+OM+7eKQ1TVdTC7-G3O1RG0Geg@mail.gmail.com> <C75A84166056C94F84D238A44AF9F6AD392F@[87.69.4.28]>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00503.txt.bz2

> From: <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>
> CC: <eliz@gnu.org>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, <dje@google.com>,	<tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:51:24 +0000
> 
> 
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Siva Chandra wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>> ...
> > 
> >>>                           For all of these cases, the elements of the
> >>> +returned list are a Python @code{dict}
> >> 
> >> Does it make sense in Python to talk about a list that is a 'dict'?
> >> IOW, is a 'dict' a special case of a list in Python?  My reading of
> >> http://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html is that it is not.
> > 
> > I am not saying that the list is a dict, but that the elements of the
> > list are dicts. Should it be worded in another fashion?
> 
> How about "each element of the returned list is a Python dict" ?

Fine with me, thanks.