From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-107476-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29542 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2013 16:13:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 29531 invoked by uid 89); 21 Nov 2013 16:13:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il
Received: from Unknown (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:13:11 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MWM00900FNN6Y00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:13:02 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MWM0094YFPQ4I30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:13:02 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:13:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] set/show code-cache
In-reply-to: <528DFA57.7000601@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83li0hense.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1384996594-20865-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1384996594-20865-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <528D781A.7070909@codesourcery.com> <528DF2C5.6050705@redhat.com> <528DFA57.7000601@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00643.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:19:35 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> On 11/21/2013 07:47 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Putting a user hat on, I'd be left wondering what "affecting
> > correctness" means here.
> 
> I don't have any troubles understanding "without affecting correctness".
> It means GDB still behaves correctly when code-cache option is on.

Right, but will the description lose something if you just omit that
part?  I mean, if we never say anything about correctness, users will
have no reason to suspect that correctness might suffer in this case.