From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-129855-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 63448 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2016 18:01:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 63377 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2016 18:01:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:TLS1.2, stephen, Stephen, sk:scross@
X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:01:05 +0000
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1aYdkA-0001zA-OH	for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:01:03 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47752)	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1aYdkA-0001z6-Ko; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:00:58 -0500
Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3782 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)	(Exim 4.82)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1aYdk9-0001Yi-PH; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:00:58 -0500
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:01:00 -0000
Message-Id: <83lh6agf8o.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stephen Cross <scross@undo-software.com>
CC: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to:	<CA+gYvwe81AEyckmYCsqGaxpr9EQ7K6e6XFjyOFDd++mX+k0iFA@mail.gmail.com>	(message from Stephen Cross on Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:46:05 +0000)
Subject: Re: Always run GDB command post-hook after pre-hook has been run
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <CA+gYvweEDqcaBAa_v189usDPtcFxCZ13UjMC5DFZBev3aNy6dg@mail.gmail.com>	<CA+gYvwfEjruJeyMWmyUFmKNH=FwwgPJeDfrf1FNtYJ+wWhkvAg@mail.gmail.com>	<56602D7B.2010404@redhat.com>	<CA+gYvwfMJDv5QWLGHw=iFKEJB3hXoJiEtp8XJKBN_H+GXwcp9A@mail.gmail.com>	<56685ED4.3030909@redhat.com>	<CA+gYvweU_t0tDYMTpJqYsXffN4Cm+rQYQbXUJr8=METzfzOu3g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+gYvwe81AEyckmYCsqGaxpr9EQ7K6e6XFjyOFDd++mX+k0iFA@mail.gmail.com>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00739.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:46:05 +0000
> From: Stephen Cross <scross@undo-software.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Here's a patch that adds 'hookerror-' to GDB. This passes the test suite
> (running 'make check' in the 'gdb' directory).
> 
> Do you think this patch is acceptable? Are there any further changes that you'd
> like me to make?

The documentation part is approved, but I don't see the ChangeLog
entry for it and I also think this should be called out in NEWS.

Thanks.