From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 809C93857C71 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:36:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 809C93857C71 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyv4S-00023l-TD; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 06:36:56 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3160 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jyv4S-0001OQ-7v; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 06:36:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:36:41 +0300 Message-Id: <83lfj9dwsm.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Andrew Burgess on Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:57:52 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdb/python: make more use of RegisterDescriptors References: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:36:58 -0000 > From: Andrew Burgess > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:57:52 +0100 > > +A @code{gdb.RegisterDescriptor} object, see @ref{Registers In Python} > +for further information. Please add a comma after the closing brace of @ref. Newer versions of Texinfo don't need that, but older ones will barf. > +@item > +A @value{GDBN} internal, platform specific number. Using these > +numbers is supported for historic reasons, but is not recommended as > +future changes to @value{GDBN} could change the mapping between numbers > +and the registers they represent, breaking any Python code. The I suggest "breaking any Python code that uses the platform-specific numbers", to qualify the breakage. The documentation part is okay with these nits fixed. Thanks.