From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ucPiDcAvEmAkXwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:30:08 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 28E991EF80; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:30:08 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FEB01E940 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:30:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89403398C80B; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:30:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 89403398C80B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1611804606; bh=/Lh2Z68TPBIFTxFtKk3QypE7OpH71pjAQXSAIO74f2A=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=eDyA4i+vduNTcxVJYxw02vIh+2odz+kpPIexmgCYXLy+u+R61/u6IaUTf/HJ081Ws e5nVE8dwHJiCYOPNI+JyH1NY+gHqGU1wUf178HENujOgUB+kumAFuiwk4WmN5UPgYP nx9IyYrWZd5Db91JAL8PPn+xhuPSlaQcez6F0JeI= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3485B398C80A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:30:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3485B398C80A Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4y0R-0008Mk-C4; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:30:03 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2759 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l4y0P-00070t-H5; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:30:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:30:16 +0200 Message-Id: <83lfcdzqk7.fsf@gnu.org> To: Luis Machado In-Reply-To: <20210127202112.2485702-8-luis.machado@linaro.org> (message from Luis Machado via Gdb-patches on Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:20:54 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/25] Documentation for memory tagging remote packets References: <20210127202112.2485702-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20210127202112.2485702-8-luis.machado@linaro.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:20:54 -0300 > From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches > > Updates on v4: > > - Add documentation for ARM-specific memory tag types. > > Updates on v3: > > - Made packet description more clear. > - Fixed Misc formatting/references issues. > > Updates on v2: > > - Update documentation to mention the packet's type field. > > -- > > Document the remote packet changes to support memory tagging. > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > > YYYY-MM-DD Luis Machado > > * gdb.texinfo (General Query Packets): Document qMemTags and > QMemTags. Document the "memory-tagging" feature. > (ARM-Specific Protocol Details): Document memory tag types. This was already approved in previous versions, right?