From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id RR1SNm/1A2JjDgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:10:07 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C9EB61F3C6; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:10:07 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 607751EA69 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:10:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA263858431 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:10:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ABA263858431 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1644426606; bh=T/awc4q8fqVdRHDDlL4Nz6knGtG0GIz0/+0y57udFtw=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=dYrtDEywj8CmTDV3ObLIrZ4SMTxdQpEyPOCpbUqo017abyJYVVuuJw7u/vZe6975O fzTcYQNaoJAL8WGA7UZjbgfKiVvrcU3wXmXhWNxmfBNlU2LwhlT1kN3X/FajWxGuMC 9cQ4zjJVUd++9Wvf04U5I1woGHBrRDy8lql7m14M= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8C73858426 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:03:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3A8C73858426 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=33870 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHqNW-0004a6-OE; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:03:42 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2294 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHqNW-00089Y-4B; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:03:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:03:29 +0200 Message-Id: <83leykug4e.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andrew Burgess In-Reply-To: <87pmnwxdf9.fsf@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:33:30 +0000) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 05/15] gdb/tui: add new 'tui window width' command and 'winwidth' alias References: <81ab0df3eebc4d865d9e63e49a1eab84e7970a6a.1644156219.git.aburgess@redhat.com> <837da8youb.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmnwxdf9.fsf@redhat.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Andrew Burgess > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:33:30 +0000 > > > Btw, should we mention that this new command will only have effect if > > more than one window is displayed? > > What about this for the description of 'tui window width'? The second > paragraph is new: It's fine, thanks. > If this is OK, then I would propose adding the same paragraph to the > description of 'tui window height' which obviously has the same > restrictions. Right.