Re: RTe: Location Specs (Was: [pushed v5] gdb/manual: Introduce location specs)

Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2022-06-02T16:37:34Z

> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:44:31 +0100
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
>
> > OK, how about this instead?
> >
> > Several @value{GDBN} commands accept arguments that specify a location
> > or locations of your program's code. Many times locations are
> > specified using a source line number, but they can also be specified
> > by a function name, an address, a label, etc. The different
> > forms of specifying a location that @value{GDBN} recognizes are
> > collectively known as forms of @dfn{location specification}, or
> > @dfn{location spec}. This section documents the forms of specifying
> > locations that @value{GDBN} recognizes.
>
> Perfect.
>
> >
> >>>>> For a C@t{++} constructor, the @value{NGCC} compiler generates several
> >>>>> -instances of the function body, used in different cases.
> >>>>> +instances of the function body, used in different cases, but their
> >>>>> +source-level names are identical, unless you qualify them.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you mean by "qualify" here?
> >>>
> >>> The "fully-qualified and prototyped function" part.
> >>
> >> That's unrelated to what is being alluded to here.
> >
> > OK, I will drop the "unless you qualify them" part.
>
> Sounds good.

Thanks, I made those changes and pushed.