From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-63177-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24603 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2009 19:06:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 24581 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Apr 2009 19:06:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:06:50 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KIG00100SYZDH00@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:06:32 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.219.161]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KIG006Y3T2U4MG0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:06:31 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:06:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: FYI: fix Solaris problem with auto host charset
In-reply-to: <m3tz4hzvmh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83k55dhlmp.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3prfa7sd5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83y6tyihzh.fsf@gnu.org> <m3bpqt7uo0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3tz4hzvmh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2

> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:53:26 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Eli> Btw, why is the code assuming that nl_langinfo always returns a
> Eli> meaningful result?
> 
> Tom> Oversight.
> 
> I re-read the relevant standard text online, and as far as I can tell,
> nl_langinfo will only return an empty string if the argument is invalid.
> So, I don't think this is an issue for gdb.

I thought "invalid argument" includes arguments that are unsupported.
Doesn't it?