From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 954 invoked by alias); 19 May 2009 19:22:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 946 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2009 19:22:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 19:21:56 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KJW00C00OF0R800@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:21:53 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.115.215]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KJW00KX5OGF8FN0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:21:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:22:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [rfa][testsuite] Consolidade Python test functions in lib/gdb.exp. In-reply-to: <20090519145908.GA24773@caradoc.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: bauerman@br.ibm.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83k54cq4oe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1240154454.19777.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1242621476.8085.4.camel@hactar> <83ws8ep9gq.fsf@gnu.org> <1242744639.10143.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090519145908.GA24773@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:59:08 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tromey@redhat.com, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:50:38AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > What do you think? Is it just fine to have the testcase files named > > differently from the source files? There's not a strict 1:1 mapping > > between them, but it's close. > > Won't the testcase files have the same 8.3 issues? Yes, they will. Which is why I suggest to rename them as well, and then the problem of file-name differences between source and testcase files will vanish. TIA