From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8130 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2009 20:41:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 8121 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2009 20:41:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:40:55 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KP300100TAJOX00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:40:52 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.144.38]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KP300MG4TG3C050@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:40:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:32:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [2 of 3] In-reply-to: <4A981551.4060504@vmware.com> To: Michael Snyder Cc: glaw@undo-software.com, jakob@virtutech.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83k50nbrja.fsf@gnu.org> References: <00cf01ca265a$d4110dc0$7c332940$@com> <83tyzucw8p.fsf@gnu.org> <002b01ca27c7$1316d8c0$39448a40$@com> <833a7ccj52.fsf@gnu.org> <4A97BA98.4010105@undo-software.com> <83y6p4aweu.fsf@gnu.org> <4A980D06.40002@undo-software.com> <83ljl3c16f.fsf@gnu.org> <4A981551.4060504@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:35:13 -0700 > From: Michael Snyder > CC: Greg Law , > "jakob@virtutech.com" , > "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > I think we should mention that "running off the end of the log" is > one way in which a reverse continue may terminate, because in fact > that is something that may happen in all of the current implementations. Please suggest a wording, and if it's clear, I won't mind.