From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9041 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2009 04:06:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 8941 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2009 04:06:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:05:53 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KRO00400Z7WDA00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:05:21 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.117.47]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KRO002QZZCW0150@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:05:21 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:06:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA, 3 of 3] save/restore process record, part 3 (save/restore) In-reply-to: <4ADA4191.4060404@vmware.com> To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, teawater@gmail.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83k4ytgxh5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4AD91D72.1030802@vmware.com> <831vl2ifui.fsf@gnu.org> <4ADA0EB3.60104@vmware.com> <83my3phjew.fsf@gnu.org> <4ADA4191.4060404@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:13:37 -0700 > From: Michael Snyder > CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , > "teawater@gmail.com" > > >> This is the same approach that is used by the "gcore" command. > >> How does "gcore" work with go32, if at all? > > > > It doesn't. DJGPP cannot generate core files. > > Well, save/restore depends on core files, so I guess > it won't work in go32. DJGPP does not support core files created from a memory image of a running process, but I don't see any reason why bfdcore_write won't work for it. > See revised patch below. Thanks. this is fine.