From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24696 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2011 19:05:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 24687 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2011 19:05:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:05:03 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LVY00100A3FFG00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:05:00 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.156.225]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LVY001MLACC7WB0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:05:00 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: New tests to watch regions larger than a machine word (Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode) In-reply-to: <201112091614.06589.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83k465muqr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201112051601.59664.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83ehwjar41.fsf@gnu.org> <201112091614.06589.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:14:06 +0000 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > and also with watchpoints that watch regions longer than 4 > > bytes on IA32 (and similarly on 64-bit hosts). > > This however doesn't seem to be tested anywhere. > > Here are a couple new tests to exercise that. They pass cleanly > before and after the proposed patch, native and gdbserver linux, > x86 and x86_64. Thanks.