From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-90544-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31759 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2012 17:09:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 31747 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2012 17:09:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:08:57 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3A00J00Y7RHV00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:08:55 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.21.156]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3A00IYEYAUVPC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:08:55 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:18:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
In-reply-to: <4F9EBD0D.2090701@earthlink.net>
To: Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83k40x5eq4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83vckviv3b.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419154853.GM25623@adacore.com> <83sjfzitxx.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4vjitnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419185329.GO25623@adacore.com> <83mx67ikxm.fsf@gnu.org> <837gx7hhxa.fsf@gnu.org> <83lilg6ysn.fsf@gnu.org> <4F9EBD0D.2090701@earthlink.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01079.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:25:49 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>
> 
> It seems logically correct... Did you try Eclipse?  This is the kind of 
> thing that CDT's MI and console bits can be sensitive to, even though 
> it's not supposed to be. :-)  If you haven't tried it, doing some 
> breakpoint commands (both from breakpoint window and console window) 
> with any recent released Eclipse should be a sufficient sniff test.
> 
> If Eclipse is good, then this is OK to commit.

Thanks.  No, I didn't try Eclipse, and I don't have it handy.  Perhaps
someone else could.