From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23328 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2013 16:18:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23313 invoked by uid 89); 22 Dec 2013 16:18:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:18:06 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY700L00UH7R900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:17:46 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY700L9AULL6KB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:17:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:18:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC, doc] fix document error on the grammar of GDB/MI output format syntax In-reply-to: <52B6CDAB.1020303@gmail.com> To: asmwarrior Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83k3ew97xb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52B69693.10107@gmail.com> <20131222080903.GA4605@adacore.com> <52B6CDAB.1020303@gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00863.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:31:55 +0800 > From: asmwarrior > CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > Looking at your patch. > > -@code{[ @var{token} ] "+" @var{async-output}} > > +@code{[ @var{token} ] "+" @var{async-output}} @var{nl} > Is it OK to put the @var{nl} inside the @code{}? Yes, definitely.