From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54594 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2019 20:46:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54575 invoked by uid 89); 26 Mar 2019 20:46:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:838 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:46:54 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8syD-0001Fs-4a; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:46:53 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4393 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h8syC-00028I-7G; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:46:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:46:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83k1gll5x8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20190326204042.GA6837@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:40:42 -0700) Subject: Re: GDB 8.3 release update (2019-03-25) References: <20190325204307.GA21459@adacore.com> <83d0men0ei.fsf@gnu.org> <20190326204042.GA6837@adacore.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:40:42 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > All the problems I knew about are fixed, but I wonder whether we need > > another pretest, since so many non-trivial changes went in. > > Yeah, I saw those, and unfortunately saw them too late to raise > a flag. Since they are in, now, might as well keep them. I didn't mean to say that those changes shouldn't have been admitted. They all fixed bugs caused by new features in this release. I just meant to say that the changes were not trivial, so maybe we have caused regressions with them. > I can create another pre-release -- but I'll wait for the various > issues identified before doing so. Might as well include those in > the next pre-release. Right. Thanks.