From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45971 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2020 19:56:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 45960 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jan 2020 19:56:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:56:49 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itzdn-0003D3-EQ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:56:47 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2007 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1itzdm-0000mV-Ht; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:56:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83k15kvb05.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: simark@simark.ca, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <874kwoa8rc.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:51:03 -0700) Subject: Re: Discrepancy between Python and Guile wrt exiting the interpreter References: <83a76l10r6.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv4rxuut.fsf@gnu.org> <7a3aa41f-367f-aa51-9b39-342874d9205e@simark.ca> <83pnffxsoy.fsf@gnu.org> <874kwoa8rc.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00647.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:51:03 -0700 > > >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Eli> The context of these questions is the Emacs's front-end for GDB, which > Eli> uses MI, and that adds even more complexities to this already quite > Eli> complex situation, in particular because Emacs until now didn't know > Eli> (nor care) whether the user invoked Python or Guile interpreter. > > I wonder if Emacs could use the "new-ui" command to create a separate MI > channel just for its use. It would only work on some platforms, but in any case I don't think I understand how that would help with the issue of exiting the Python interpreter. What did I miss?