From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30218 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2009 17:26:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30207 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2009 17:26:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:26:34 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KQ400100LQ81A00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:26:30 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.38.189]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KQ400FELLS5I510@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:26:30 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:26:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix "show convenience" test In-reply-to: <8ac60eac0909170937t14e62114o9a74d1ef110643b1@mail.gmail.com> To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83iqfhwkhh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200909152132.15317.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909161416.22783.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83ab0uyfzk.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0909170937t14e62114o9a74d1ef110643b1@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:37:08 -0700 > From: Paul Pluzhnikov > Cc: Pedro Alves , sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Ouch! sorry about that (binary attachments tend to have this effect on > > me ;-). > > The attachment was actually text, just base64-encoded: Lately, my eyes lost their ability to read base64 without help ;-) > How does the attached patch look? It's fine now, thanks. > Here's the doc part, so you don't have to deal with base64: Thanks for making it easier for me.