From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4237 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2010 15:27:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 4078 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2010 15:27:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:27:14 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LCJ00100UNJRY00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:27:12 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.63.39]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LCJ0013YUXAKT70@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:27:12 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:27:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] Implement support for PowerPC BookE masked watchpoints In-reply-to: <1290864564.3009.45.camel@hactar> To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ipzi6azz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1290548544.3164.37.camel@hactar> <83oc9c73me.fsf@gnu.org> <1290864564.3009.45.camel@hactar> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2 > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, > brobecker@adacore.com > Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:29:24 -0200 > > I just wanted to make sure that you're happy with the wording in this > paragraph: > > +* When locally debugging programs on PowerPC BookE processors running > + a Linux kernel version 2.6.34 or later GDB supports masked hardware > + watchpoints, which specifiy a mask in addition to an address to watch. > + The mask specifies that some bits of an address (the bits which are > + reset in the mask) should be ignored when matching the address accessed > + by the inferior against the watchpoint address. See the "PowerPC Embedded" > + section in the user manual for more details. I'm okay with it, but please put a comma after "or later". > and also with the new "Changed commands" section that I added. This section is fine. Thanks.