From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-90653-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30310 invoked by alias); 3 May 2012 17:03:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 30289 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2012 17:02:58 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2012 17:02:40 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3G00400HZNEX00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 20:02:17 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3G004N9HZOEQ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 May 2012 20:02:13 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 17:03:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Autoload-breakpoints without report-async
In-reply-to: <4FA2B434.60706@mentor.com>
To: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao_Qi@mentor.com, stan_shebs@mentor.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83ipgd6vw0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4FA2B434.60706@mentor.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 00:37:08 +0800
> From: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>
> CC: Yao Qi <Yao_Qi@mentor.com>, Stan Shebs <stan_shebs@mentor.com>, Eli
>  Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> According to the mail form Yao.  I thought make the autoload-breakpoints and report-async function together make it too hard to review.  So I move the function that depend on the report-async to be a series of separate patches after report-async.
> Then the other patches of autoload-breakpoints can be reveiw separate from report-async.

Is the documentation part here any different from the last time I
reviewed it?