From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-94625-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17850 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2012 09:42:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 17842 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2012 09:42:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:42:19 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAJ00B00HCLMY00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:42:17 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAJ00BFJHMHN510@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:42:17 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:42:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] traceframe_changed observer and MI notification
In-reply-to: <50583505.9030006@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83ipbb1xbx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1346404195-20864-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <5057BB72.9070305@codesourcery.com> <83pq5j257w.fsf@gnu.org> <50582156.50107@codesourcery.com> <83lig72206.fsf@gnu.org> <50583505.9030006@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:47:01 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> How about the new one?

OK, but ...

> +@deftypefun void traceframe_changed (int @var{tfnum}, int @var{tpnum})
> +The trace frame is changed to @var{tfnum} (e.g., by using the
> +@code{tfind} command).  The number of the tracepoint associated with
> +this traceframe is @var{tpnum}.  If @var{tfnum} is negative, it means
> +@value{GDBN} resumes live debugging.

As I wrote earlier, the last sentence should follow the first one,
because it refers to tfnum, not to tpnum.