From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22775 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2014 15:56:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22765 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2014 15:56:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout27.012.net.il Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il (HELO mtaout27.012.net.il) (80.179.55.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:56:56 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0200400HC5XP00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:56:05 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0200302HLH9940@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:56:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:56:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [Ada/NEWS+doco] New Ada maintenance command to ignore descriptive types (DWARF). In-reply-to: <1390797415-6071-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83iot5a05d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1390797415-6071-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00984.txt.bz2 > From: Joel Brobecker > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:36:55 +0400 > > +* New options > + > +maint ada set ignore-descriptive-types (on|off) > +maint ada show ignore-descriptive-types > + Control whether the debugger should ignore descriptive types. I would say "... descriptive types in Ada programs", so that readers who don't use Ada will not bother looking this up in the manual, even if they missed the crucial hint in the name of the option. > +In particular, this convention makes use of @samp{descriptive types}, This should be in @dfn, not @samp, as you are introducing new terminology. Also, a @cindex entry for that would be nice. > +The default is to use descriptives types (@code{off}). ^^^^^^ "not to ignore" is better than "to use" here. OK with those changes. However, I wonder if we really should document this in such a detailed manner, if this is really a temporary measure. Your call. Thanks.