From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16027 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2014 03:41:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16011 invoked by uid 89); 19 Mar 2014 03:41:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout24.012.net.il Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il (HELO mtaout24.012.net.il) (80.179.55.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:40:46 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2N00N00Y59VM00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 05:38:36 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2N0001IZGCVK20@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 05:38:36 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix "PC register is not available" issue In-reply-to: <5328835C.4010908@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ioraam9m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83txawa9wk.fsf@gnu.org> <20140318161608.GD4282@adacore.com> <83pplja2h9.fsf@gnu.org> <20140318165413.GE4282@adacore.com> <83k3bra0rx.fsf@gnu.org> <5328835C.4010908@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:33:16 +0000 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > I see that the GetThreadContext call (do_windows_fetch_inferior_registers) > doesn't check for errors (I think it should (*)). It'd be interesting to know whether gdb can > actually read the registers off of this thread How to see those registers? > and if so, what's the thread's backtrace like. Why would we be interested in that info?